Casual sex is sexual activity that takes places outside a romantic relationship and implies an absence of commitment, emotional attachment, or familiarity between sexual partners. Examples are sexual activity while casually dating, one-night stands.
Table of contents
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. Dating is a not quite so commonly used term which has a more specific meaning. While I can accept that there are a lot of articles clustered around a related series of concepts, and that there seems to be some confusion as to the boundaries of the articles as currently titled, I do not think 'casual dating' is a good article title.
If one or more of the present cluster of articles are to be renamed, then I think it is important that the new names are very clear and very different. Dating is a metaphor at best and more likely a euphemism. The word is related to dates in the calendar and refers literally to setting a time and place when and where to meet in the future.
Doing this has nothing necessarily to do with romance or sex. To link it so strongly to sex and sexual relationships is very much an Americanism, I think. In other branches of English 'to make a date' or asking 'do we have a date? It is true that the transitive verb 'to be dating someone' is fairly clear, but I think that this clarity is only due to the number of American films and TV programs I have watched.
In any actual literal sense, it still looks to my non-US eyes like an almost nonsensical series of words. I'm all for clarifying article titles, but I'm dead against naming articles with prudish s US-centric euphemisms. Sorry, I couldn't resist that final sentence - it sounds stronger than I really mean: Echo because Nigelj already has the Casual sexual relationship article WP: Watchlisted , something needs to be done about the current title , either a rename or a WP: Merge with the Casual sex article Though, with a WP: Merge, I don't know where we would then redirect Casual dating It should probably go ahead and be redirected there.
Wikipedia is currently acting as though casual sex and casual sexual relationship are two different things. To the vast majority of WP: Reliable sources, they are not. And if one wants to state "those are just American sources," I'm certain that casual sex and casual sexual relationship usually are not distinguished in the literature in other countries as well. We should be going by what the WP: Casual sex and casual sexual relationship aren't even distinguished in common discourse.
The term dating is a common term, and we currently don't call it an Americanism in the Dating article; nor should we.
- heightism dating!
- Online dating service - Wikipedia.
- dating in singapore ideas.
This because, as seen in that article, dating has been mentioned and studied cross-culturally meaning what dating is like in other countries. That people, including Americans, sometimes use the expression "It's a date. We don't start the Dating article off by stating that it may refer to any meeting between people; nor should we. Similarly, Beyond My Ken argued above that "casual relationship" can mean any relationship between people. We are being too nitpicky with the titles, at the expense of our readership confusing them by making them think that there is some true difference between casual sex and casual sexual relationship.
In the Dating article, we currently lead with the most common definition , which is a romantic relationship that might involve sexual intimacy. The term casual dating is defined similarly, but with a more casual aspect, and it has been mentioned and studied cross-culturally. The terms dating and casual dating usually have nothing to do with "prudish s US-centric euphemisms.
Casual relationship - Wikipedia
If they are euphemisms, then what are they supposed to mean? They are a combination of all three, but are still distinct from those matters. Maybe we should have all the casual dating material relocated to the Dating article, and all the casual sex material relocated to the Casual sex article, and then delete the Casual sexual relationship article.
I was reminded of this article's title matter because of this recent edit Viriditas made to the Hookup culture article. Reading the lead of that article and seeing both "casual sex" and "casual sexual relationship" mentioned there brought me back here. Viriditas might have a different opinion than me on this rename matter, but if something productive happens in the case of fixing this name issue, it will have been an actual productive discussion.
Is it only the material in the two current articles Casual sex and Casual sexual relationship? Is there some other way to divide the material in those two articles? If we mixed all the section headings of the two articles into one list, would you be able to see a new way to separate them into two articles on actually different topics, do you think?
It does seem that this article is mostly about sex at college, while the other is more general. I don't see a problem. You can swim in the shallow end or make your way to the deep end.
Comparison of online dating services
You can start with dipping your toe in and feeling the water on your feet until at some point you're all the way in, doing laps, splashing around, and enjoying yourself. Calling this article a "casual sexual relationship" is like calling an article on swimming "diving". It's only one small part of the topic, just like sex is only one aspect of casual dating. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. Retrieved from " https: Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles Mid-importance Sexology and sexuality articles WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles Start-Class sociology articles Low-importance sociology articles Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, Q1.
Media coverage of crimes related to online dating may also contribute to perceptions of its risks. The emergence of dating sites that promote adultery, such as Ashley Madison , has stirred some controversy. Online subscription-based services can suffer from complaints about billing practices. Some online dating service providers may have fraudulent membership fees or credit card charges. Furthermore, different functionalities may be offered to members who have paid or not paid for subscriptions, resulting in some confusion around who can view or contact whom.
Consolidation within the online dating industry has led to different newspapers and magazines now advertising the same website database under different names. In the UK, for example, Time Out "London Dating" , The Times "Encounters" , and The Daily Telegraph "Kindred Spirits" , all offer differently named portals to the same service—meaning that a person who subscribes through more than one publication has unwittingly paid more than once for access to the same service.
On any given dating site, the sex ratio is commonly unbalanced. When one gets into the specialty niche websites where the primary demographic is male, one typically gets a very unbalanced ratio of male to female or female to male. Studies have suggested that men are far more likely to send messages on dating sites than women. There is some evidence that there may be differences in how women online rate male attractiveness as opposed to how men rate female attractiveness. Gay rights groups have complained that certain websites that restrict their dating services to heterosexual couples are discriminating against homosexuals.
Homosexual customers of the popular eHarmony dating website have made many attempts to litigate discriminatory practices.
Less than half of Internet daters are open to dating people of all races. A class action lawsuit alleged Match.
In , a former employee sued adultery website Ashley Madison claiming repetitive strain injuries as creating fake profiles in one three week span "required an enormous amount of keyboarding" which caused the worker to develop severe pain in her wrists and forearms. In January , an already-married Facebook user attempting to close a pop-up advertisement for Zoosk.
In , It's Just Lunch International was the target of a New York class action alleging unjust enrichment as IJL staff relied on a uniform, misleading script which informed prospective customers during initial interviews that IJL already had at least two matches in mind for those customers' first dates regardless of whether or not that was true. As soon as a new user set up a free profile, he or she began to receive messages that appeared to be from other members living nearby, expressing romantic interest or a desire to meet.
However, users were unable to respond to these messages without upgrading to a paid membership The lawsuit alleged that her fellow executives and co-founders Rad and Mateen had engaged in discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation against her, while Tinder's corporate supervisor, IAC's Sam Yagan, did nothing. Neither talked about the case, citing a non-disclosure agreement, but Daggett's lawsuit gives plenty of detail about her grievances with the California-based company. But Daggett says she did not get what she paid for.
Instead, she suffered brief romantic entanglements with increasingly disastrous men. The law requires dating services meeting specific criteria—including having as their primary business to connect U. In , the state of New Jersey passed a law which requires the sites to disclose whether they perform background checks.
In the People's Republic of China , using a transnational matchmaking agency involving a monetary transaction is illegal.
mesmaucamlern.ml Singapore's Social Development Network is the governmental organization facilitating dating activities in the country. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Internet portal Sexuality portal Sociology portal. Factors That Lead to Online Dating".
Investigating the market metaphor in online dating". She falls in love with Vinny while the puppy is licking her face. They leave together with the new puppy. The scene now moves six years ahead and shows Melissa and Jamie ringing the doorbell of Stacy's home for a social gathering. Stacy and Vinny are now married with two small boys and a fully-grown Golden Retriever.
As Vinny is greeting Jamie with his two boys and dog and having a great time with all, Stacy and Melissa are at a distance standing together and looking toward their two significant others. They playfully tease each other as they always have throughout their many years as friends.
Stacy says to Melissa, "There's your boyfriend. They both smile and hug one another and the film ends. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.